-
Website
http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/ -
Original page
http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/whatley_on_the_iphone.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
PatrickatJPR
80 comments · 6 points
-
South77
119 comments · 1 points
-
MarkW
127 comments · 1 points
-
MartinSFP
86 comments · 7 points
-
David Carrington
75 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Calling all Nokia & Symbian geniuses: Am I wrong?
2 weeks ago · 36 comments
-
Mobile Industry Review turns into a weekly newsletter next Friday
2 weeks ago · 29 comments
-
What’s the best backpack a geek can buy?
1 week ago · 16 comments
-
The future is dire for Nokia & Symbian applications: Dead by 2012?
2 weeks ago · 20 comments
-
Why the Nokia N900 is No Better Than an HTC Mogul
2 weeks ago · 20 comments
-
Calling all Nokia & Symbian geniuses: Am I wrong?
This I'm excited about. I want to know detail, but if the Mobile Me integration runs deep enough, snap-upload-view on map on your homepage. That's it. No arseing about with Flickr scripts, KML files, dates/time GPS track sync etc.
Now admittedly I'm already a .Mac convert, and have been paying Apple for the last 6 years or whatever to host our family webpage. Videos and piccys, nicely laid out, dead simple to upload/edit and view. Everything else was just too hard, too fragmented. So I'm happy to part with 70 quid a year or whatever to have Apple do all the hard work for me. And 20GB of storage too, up from 10 now. That's a whole lot of piccys.
Yup, paying the man 70 quid a year does mark me beyond Normob, but just how easy/seamless does it need to be before it does become mainstream? Have Apple just created a new revenue stream - iPhone users who get a 60-day Mobile Me trial, get hooked on geotagging/uploading seamlessly, build a base of images/maps etc and then can't bear to let go? Hmmm......Nokia utterly failed that ask with Club Nokia. Can Apple pull it off?
But, sigh, still 2MP. As we know, it's not all about headline pixel counts. Hopefully the aperture, ISO & shutter speed management will be better. Interestingly, no mention of shooting video, but there are 3rd party apps that can do that now pretty well.
Those Australians and Americans are well sorted, with UMTS850 support in the chipset. Nice. 3.5G speeds in-building and in the woods.
And the pricing, if indeed it is $199, er, that's a hundred quid. Blimey. look how they shifted at 169. That is actually the biggest piece for me.
/m
So many apps, so little time for coffee and a lie-down...
You've still got a piss-poor 2 MP cam, no A2DP, no video (that we know of), and there's still no copy/paste.
I did think it AWFULLY brazen to denounce multitasking completely. I disagree that it's a poor choice, but *do* think this push business is....interesting. As I heard it, though, you'll still need to be online to use it, is that correct?
There have been a few apps that can do this, notably ZoneTag from Yahoo!, but after nearly 2 years and with all of Yahoo!/Flickr's power behind it, it's still a niche of a niche. My bet is that in the *first week* of the new functionality coming out for i3G and iP2.0 upgrades, there will be more geotagged images from iPhones uploaded than the entire base to date.
It's all about how easy it is, how to get the OS out of the way. With Symbian you know you are using it because it's in your face every 30 seconds asking for permission to do something you've done a thousand tiimes before.
We saw it with the Google hits over last Christmas - put a bog standard, 'me too' technology enabler with a beautiful UI in the hands of Normobs and they will prove the industry pundits utterly wrong.
I don't quite get the multitasking issue. The iPhone already 'multitasks' - my email checks itself in the background, so do SMS, I can put iPod tracks in the background and pause/play/skip at will while in other apps. Is it a case of what Apple allows to multitask?
/m
In the short term nothing but the price matters. After that... just watch. Repeat of the 'ipod sales curve' anyone?
And it has to be said, Geo tagging on the N95 is great when it works, but can be a real pain. Ease of use is definatly the key. I liked the point Mike made on another post last week pointing out that the iPhone was the most populr camera phone used on Flickr. Reckon his prediction on geo tagged images will come true pretty quickly.
You can start to see the begining of a set of princeples that outline the 'iPhone mobile economy' - ease of use, unmetered access etc. I want to see operators start to pick these up an run with them. That's the way to compete with the iPhone - usability not feature set.
Meantime, I am very impressed with the Apple bullsh1t marketing that tries to make out that no one else ever did what they are doing. They spent how long telling us that the Exchange application works just like web-based Exchange on PC ... woohoo you can drag and drop emails and files.
But the games look good. And there is huge buzz. iPhone 3 might actually have me putting my hand in my pocket and giving ATT/Apple some of my cash :-)
The industry has had many years and hundreds of models to get a user-friendly interface, and has failed miserably. The fact that we as pundits *need* to understand Symbian, multitasking, .SIS files, Bluetooth paring etc is why Normobs have been singularly unimpressed with the mobile experience to date. Oh, apart from SMS & voice calls. But even there, Apple have trumped everyone with the threaded SMS implementation and the in-call controls. Why, you positively *want* to do multiway calling on the iPhone, just for the lovely experience of switching around and bringing others into the conversation.
...and now they bring that love to email and file sharing/management via mobile. Proof will be in pudding come 11 July.
Cheers
/m
But it's not all about interface. That's clear from other comments here. Apple has to add more of what's missing before the technophiles move over in large numbers. But meantime, Nokia and others are slowly unwinding their own interface design and develop engines. The next two years are going to be very exciting. I'll be shocked if Apple doesn't take a hammering very soon.
The truth is, the iPhone has a very capable camera that captures photos just as good as an N95 in good daylight situations. Performance drops off dramatically as light levels drop but that's true of the N95 too. Video capability is simply a matter of software. We've seen 3rd party apps that provide this and we'll, no doubt, see those apps pop up in the app store when it launches.
Can you honestly tell me which of these was taken with an N95 and which used an iPhone: http://invalid.name/iphonevsn95.png
There's a great article HERE that pretty much demolishes the 'it's crap because it's only 2MP' argument. I love the term 'Camera Measurabators' to describe those who only count raw MP.
/m