<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in US operators hit with SMS charges suit</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 22:28:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: US operators hit with SMS charges suit</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html#comment-507687</link><description>It's official - SMS 'more expensive than Hubble Telescope'. I read this article the other day that said it's 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco's in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (&lt;a href="http://www.yoober.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.yoober.com&lt;/a&gt;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Britney101</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 22:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: US operators hit with SMS charges suit</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html#comment-502526</link><description>"An indication of America’s more litigious culture or that the US networks need to shape up customer service?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both really.  We are the most horribly litigious society on earth, no question there.  However, it IS a fair point to say that if you can't opt out of something, you ought to have some right to not be charged for it.  My parents are on AT&amp;T, both elderly (though my dad hates it when I say that!), and only in the last couple of years have they gotten into text messaging.  My dad was SHOCKED when I told him that inbound messaging was charged at .15 cents a pop or whatever it is.  As he put it "if I know I'm close to max on my minutes package, I can just ignore the call, but I have no option to do that with text".   They both finally added the minimum bucket of texts (around 200 or 250 I think), just to protect themselves -- being on a fixed income, he can't afford to have some wildly high charge because someone spams him with text messages. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really, incoming calls and texts should both be free, but likely that won't happen here for a long time, if ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-olly</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ollysk2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: US operators hit with SMS charges suit</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html#comment-501068</link><description>This is completely true and a common complaint among users on Howard Forums in the T-Mobile USA sub-forum. Once upon a time T-Mobile had free incoming but has since done away with that feature. T-Mobile may have some of the better messaging packages yet at the same time they leave customer without the option of stopping text. If you call T-Mobile CS they will say if they turn off text then they can't message you either. That is complete BS. T-Mobile may not have the system setup to prevent outside message and yet allow their messages but that doesn't mean it can't be done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>