-
Website
http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/ -
Original page
http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/08/twitters_uk_text_replacements_-_its_going_to_be_hard_work.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
PatrickatJPR
80 comments · 6 points
-
South77
119 comments · 1 points
-
MarkW
127 comments · 1 points
-
MartinSFP
86 comments · 7 points
-
David Carrington
75 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Calling all Nokia & Symbian geniuses: Am I wrong?
2 weeks ago · 36 comments
-
Mobile Industry Review turns into a weekly newsletter next Friday
2 weeks ago · 29 comments
-
What’s the best backpack a geek can buy?
1 week ago · 16 comments
-
The future is dire for Nokia & Symbian applications: Dead by 2012?
2 weeks ago · 20 comments
-
Why the Nokia N900 is No Better Than an HTC Mogul
2 weeks ago · 20 comments
-
Calling all Nokia & Symbian geniuses: Am I wrong?
You're missing the point and not seeing the bigger picture...
The *awesome* thing about Twitter is the DIRECT MESSAGES., (DMs).
I find you online. I follow you. ...you follow me back.
I don't know you well enough to give you my number and vice versa BUT through the medium of Twitter I can send an SMS direct to your mobile phone without having this personal information.
This feature is now gone and I personally miss it a lot.
I'm looking at a couple of solutions at the moment - TweetSMS, 3Jam and Twitteroo to name but three.
'the drivel' as you call it, would cost a fair amount, you're right.
But the solution I choose will only be for DMs and '@replies'.
Do you see?
So you're going to pay to receive text messages? But only DM and @replies?
Ergo, you too -- James Whatley -- *the* social media whizz, doesn't value
the normal Tweets enough to pay for them?
2008/8/26 Disqus <>
1) Desktop clients like Twhirl and/or Tweetdeck
2) The Mobile Web for http://m.twitter.com or the far-superior http://m.slandr.net
3) When Twitter turn IM alerts back on I'll have them coming in via Gtalk & Agile.
Ya dig?
your account enough to pay for it? Only the DMs and @replies?
2008/8/26 Disqus <>
If I didn't have the tools I listed above available to me then I would pay for the traffic.
As it stands, I don't need to as I have other ways and means of dipping into the stream.
For the first one, a location component would be helpful. There are things I may care about based on proximity, although this would require some additional categorization on the sender's end.
Why would you only consider paying for the DMs and replies texted?
2008/8/26 Disqus <>
I get what you're saying - I only ever used the SMS for DMs. But as twitter uses email to notify you of DMs anyway - why not just set up push email on your phone?
number or email address?
2008/8/26 Disqus <>
Tweet
is made in a room
full of normal people
<Haikubreak>(you know, the ones MNO's worry about, the ones who actually Keep The Lights On)</Haikubreak>
does anyone
give
a toss?
I don't think I've ever used SMS for the main twitter stream from those I'm following... I never used it anyway - agree with James here - the real value lies in DMs, @replies and #tags..
I've got push email on my phone, so every time I get a DM I'm notified...
If I'm following a conversation via #tag, I can just use mobile web... @ replies... mobile web...
Bothered? nope. Twitter less useful on mobile? Only marginally. Just get an email instead of an SMS.
A message is a message is a message... as long as it gets to me, I'm happy... don't care how.
There is no market right now for anyone trying to set up companies which allow users to pay for Twitters to be sent out on a wholesale basis (certainly not one which would justify the effort to set it up). The content works when it's free, but as we've all mentioned, when it's a discussion on 'cup cakes', then who actually gives a toss? It's a fun novelty for a geeky narcissistic 'elite'.
It'll be interesting to see how it grows/evolves in regions where SMS is still free such as the US. I actually think if anything there'll be a user backlash against information dissemination overload anyway. Who apart from bloggers actually updates their facebook status anymore? We're the trailblazers in new technologies and we're slowly reducing down our social network exposure and tightening up our digital footprints.. aren't we?
I think their future lies in the B2C world, although at that stage they're simply a software/solution vendor and they'll be competing in a much larger market..
Discuss :)
2008/8/26 Disqus <>
I now read twitter on the web or through the rss reader
Don't miss the tweets as I only received DMs on my handset and can use pushmail for that.
Only used the tweets for following events like Spain's election and similar
Also none of my real life friends use it and would never use it if they have to pay for it
BTW, does anyone know the penetration/popularity of twitter among UK normobs?