<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in “Mobile-Crushes” – They end now!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:49:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: “Mobile-Crushes” – They end now!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html#comment-4026602</link><description>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think "Bigger, better, faster" is necessarily a good thing; because it's only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food for thought!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MaManfie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:49:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: “Mobile-Crushes” – They end now!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html#comment-4026490</link><description>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn't appeal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn't have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MaManfie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:43:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: “Mobile-Crushes” – They end now!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html#comment-4022290</link><description>The INQ1 from 3 doesn't get your attention, Samantha?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: “Mobile-Crushes” – They end now!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html#comment-4021311</link><description>I think I know how you're feeling Sam. I'm also looking around at the moment, but there isn't a phone there that 'grabs' me big time. they've all got something missing - often unquantifiable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't want to lose facilities I currently have, and don't want to have to change the way e.g. I organise my photos on the PC, just to fit with the latest and greatest idea which will be out of date again next week when some bright spark has a different (not always better) idea of how I should work with my phone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess what I'm after is some stability for a while which incidently would allow for economies of scale to kick in on the price as retooling wouldn't be such a necessity. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is change (Bigger! Better! faster! more!) always a good thing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ocifant</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:47:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: “Mobile-Crushes” – They end now!</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html#comment-4021027</link><description>Perhaps if you tell people on here what you are after (what the phone needs to be able to do) then we can possibly recommend one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;K</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kcjh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>