<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in End of revenue sharing for Apple and 3G iPhone</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><atom:link href="https://smstextnews.disqus.com/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone_37/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:56:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: End of revenue sharing for Apple and 3G iPhone</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html#comment-643884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps Apple don't need a slice of calls and texts if they're now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm surprised they haven't set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they're not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they'll buy SpinVox ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TerenceEden</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:56:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: End of revenue sharing for Apple and 3G iPhone</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html#comment-639109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The end of the revenue share agreement is being seen as a big victory for the mobile operators but I disagree. I can't believe a company as canny as Apple gave up a revenue share without major concessions being made by the other side and I wonder whether the "exclusivity" clause is really as rock solid as it seemed a year ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day, the revenue share tied Apple to O2 and AT&amp;amp;T and now that it might have gone why on earth would Apple continue to promise exclusivity for ever more. I think this one might slip sooner than some people think. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>