<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in Colin Orviss, Senior VP of Patni Telecoms on the iPhone 2.0</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><atom:link href="https://smstextnews.disqus.com/colin_orviss_senior_vp_of_patni_telecoms_on_the_iphone_20/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:48:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Colin Orviss, Senior VP of Patni Telecoms on the iPhone 2.0</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/colin_orviss_senior_vp_of_patni_telecoms_on_the_iphone_20.html#comment-644307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Question on the iPhone price:  It does not appear to me they lowered the price.  They now charge $10 more am month for their services and make the customer sign a two year contract.  This means an increase in total out of pocket expense of $240, thereby bringing this iPhone cost, (as compared to the 2g model with $10 less a month), up to $439.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I ask again, did they really lower the cost?  Apple seems to have found a way to get around the biggest hurdle as to why folks didn't buy it, cost, by hiding a new monthly fee, and also a way to increase revenue by putting the apps via iTunes easily accessible on the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems like this is a pretty good marketing move by iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>