<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:24:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2638707</link><description>We are most definitely not Paxo nor are we modeling ourselves on Paxo!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't have a problem getting PR.  Now and again we've published press&lt;br&gt;releases verbatim when judged appropriate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2008/9/26 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2638558</link><description>Re: Sending questions in advance -- can't imagine Paxo sending a list of questions over to his interviewees ahead of time. If you can think on your feet then, good luck to you. If you parse a reply through the PR, well then you get PR.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">South77</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:49:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2638534</link><description>There's absolutely nothing different -- ultimately -- from me asking a&lt;br&gt;question not sent in advance.  What's stopping the person I'm speaking to&lt;br&gt;'spinning me' in real time?  Absolutely nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd like to report their message.  Then give some viewpoint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2008/9/26 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2638383</link><description>You'd still be repeating a prepapared statement, even if it 'feels' a little more normal. Unless you get the person on the phone and ask them *your* question (not sent in advance) it's another form of PR, not reporting or analysis. No wonder the PRs like it -- a new format to massage the message.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">South77</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2638051</link><description>Look forward to it, Nick!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2008/9/26 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2636270</link><description>I'll drop you a line to arrange a time to chat about my/our latest project shortly!  Keep up the good work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Ris</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:15:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2623239</link><description>Ewan, I agree with Mark. Press releases have their place for mass distribution of news, but the best articles for you (and coverage for my clients) comes with a personal note or interview that is specific to MIR.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatrickatJoshuaPR</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:43:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2623057</link><description>That's good feedback, Mark -- thank you. Let's see!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2008/9/25 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changing things around with public relations at MIR</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/changing_things_around_with_public_relations_at_mir.html#comment-2623029</link><description>I think you've got that spot-on, Ewan. As a PR myself it's great for me when people take my copy and just use it. But I have to confess it slightly depresses the former journalist in me, because it's lazy and I was taught to question everything and write it my own way. Your new approach will make for much better content than standard 'churn' and the PRs should embrace it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarkW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>