<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:21:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/79_of_uk_mobile_email_users_would_accept_ad-funded_service.html#comment-606201</link><description>you will still have to pay data to the operator?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:21:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/79_of_uk_mobile_email_users_would_accept_ad-funded_service.html#comment-589717</link><description>yeah, the concept is that your entire email service would be ad-funded</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:08:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/79_of_uk_mobile_email_users_would_accept_ad-funded_service.html#comment-589694</link><description>I thought the ads would fund the provision of the e-mail service not just the data... so it woudn't really apply to anyone who has it from another source.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bensmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:05:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/79_of_uk_mobile_email_users_would_accept_ad-funded_service.html#comment-587975</link><description>I see your point. I know a few mobile power user and average users, of those averave users the ones that would consider paying for email too expensive are the ones that would also find setting up an email account on a phone too difficult or would have no need for it so wouldn't use it if even if it was free. I can only speak from experience of the people I know. I did set email up on a friends phone once and as they were already paying for data it wouldn't have cost them anything but they never used it because they couldnt find a need for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steves71</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:57:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/79_of_uk_mobile_email_users_would_accept_ad-funded_service.html#comment-587946</link><description>For you, Steve, aye -- but for a standard normob customer who thinks five&lt;br&gt;quid a month is a bit too steep?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 79% of UK mobile email users would accept ad-funded service</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/06/79_of_uk_mobile_email_users_would_accept_ad-funded_service.html#comment-587940</link><description>A free add funded service is fine if it's replacing something thats expensive (for Ewan this seems to be the case) but as I currently pay £5 per month for "unlimited" mobile data and within this I also have exchange email pushed to my phone, receiving adds would be a huge price to pay to save a few quid each month.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steves71</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>