<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in 250 Mbps &amp;#8211; now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><atom:link href="https://smstextnews.disqus.com/250_mbps_now_that8217s_what_i_call_3g/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:19:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps &amp;#8211; now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And no-one calls me Bob!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:19:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps &amp;#8211; now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Ben Smith: Not according to DoCoMo.  There's a lovely picture put out by DoCoMo (&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/5jlc3e)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/5jlc3e)"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/5jlc3e)&lt;/a&gt; that has it as nearly 4g.  God knows how fast the company is aiming for when it hits the fourth generation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@ smstextnews.  I'm inclined to agree, but we can live in hope&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps &amp;#8211; now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If it does anywhere near 250,000,000 bytes of transmission -- of direct&lt;br&gt;throughput -- I'll eat-me-hat.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ewan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps &amp;#8211; now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't LTE generally referred to as '4G'?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps &amp;#8211; now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-987556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll take two, please bob.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ewan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:06:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>