<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mobile Industry Review - Latest Comments in 250 Mbps - now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:19:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps - now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988913</link><description>And no-one calls me Bob!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:19:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps - now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988901</link><description>@ Ben Smith: Not according to DoCoMo.  There's a lovely picture put out by DoCoMo (&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/5jlc3e" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/5jlc3e&lt;/a&gt;) that has it as nearly 4g.  God knows how fast the company is aiming for when it hits the fourth generation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@ smstextnews.  I'm inclined to agree, but we can live in hope</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps - now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988248</link><description>If it does anywhere near 250,000,000 bytes of transmission -- of direct&lt;br&gt;throughput -- I'll eat-me-hat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps - now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-988220</link><description>Isn't LTE generally referred to as '4G'?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bensmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 250 Mbps - now that&amp;#8217;s what I call 3G</title><link>http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/07/250_mbps_-_now_thats_what_i_call_3g.html#comment-987556</link><description>I'll take two, please bob.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:06:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>